Laurence Hurley

Laurence Hurley

Associate Director, BIO5 Institute
Professor, Medicinal Chemistry-Pharmaceutical Sciences
Professor, Medicinal Chemistry-Pharmacology and Toxicology
Professor, Cancer Biology - GIDP
Professor, BIO5 Institute
Primary Department
Department Affiliations
Contact
(520) 626-5622

Work Summary

Laurence Hurley's long-time research interest is in molecular targeting of DNA, first by covalent binders (CC-1065 and psorospermin), then as compounds that target protein–DNA complexes (pluramycins and Et 743), and most recently as four-stranded DNA structures (G-quadruplexes and i-motifs). He was the first to show that targeting G-quadruplexes could inhibit telomerase (Sun et al. [1997] J. Med. Chem., 40, 2113) and that targeting G-quadruplexes in promoter complexes results in inhibition of transcription (Siddiqui-Jain et al. [2002] Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 99, 11593).

Research Interest

Laurence Hurley, PhD, embraces an overall objective to design and develop novel antitumor agents that will extend the productive lives of patients who have cancer. His research program in medicinal chemistry depends upon a structure-based approach to drug design that is intertwined with a clinical oncology program in cancer therapeutics directed by Professor Daniel Von Hoff at TGen at the Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale. Dr. Hurley directs a research group that consists of a team of graduate and postdoctoral students with expertise in structural and synthetic chemistry working alongside students in biochemistry and molecular biology. NMR and in vivo evaluations of novel agents are carried out in collaboration with other research groups in the Arizona Cancer Center. At present, they have a number of different groups of compounds that target a variety of intracellular receptors. These receptors include: (1) transcriptional regulatory elements, (2) those involved in cell signaling pathways, and (3) protein-DNA complexes, including transcriptional factor-DNA complexes.In close collaboration with Dr. Gary Flynn in Medicinal Chemistry, he has an ongoing program to target a number of important kinases, including aurora kinases A and B, p38, and B-raf. These studies involve structure-based approaches as well as virtual screening. Molecular modeling and synthetic medicinal chemistry are important tools.The protein–DNA complexes involved in transcriptional activation of promoter complexes using secondary DNA structures are also targets for drug design.

Publications

Hurley, L. H., & Boyd, F. (1988). DNA as a target for drug action. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 9(11), 402-407.

PMID: 3078076;Abstract:

DNA is the presumed target for a number of clinically useful anticancer drugs. In this review, Laurence Hurley and Leslie Boyd discuss the appropriateness of the term 'receptor' for DNA and outline the forseeable problems in designing drugs that will produce a defined pharmacological response through interaction with DNA. They describe the structural features which present DNA as an attractive target for drug design, and the possible characteristics of drugs that react with DNA to produce a predetermined biochemical response. Finally, they outline modern approaches to elucidating the structural and biological consequences of drug modification. © 1998.

Han, H., Bennett, R. J., & Hurley, L. H. (2000). Inhibition of unwinding of G-quadruplex structures by Sgs1 helicase in the presence of N,N'-Bis[2-(1-piperidino)ethyl]-3,4,9,10-perylenetetracarboxylic diimide, a G-quadruplex-interactive ligand. Biochemistry, 39(31), 9311-9316.

PMID: 10924124;Abstract:

N,N'-Bis[2-(1-piperidino)ethyl]-3,4,9,10-perylenetetracarboxylic diimide (PIPER), a perylene derivative, is a very potent and selective G-quadruplex DNA-interactive agent. It has been shown to inhibit DNA polymerase and telomerase by stacking externally to the G-tetrads in the G-quadruplex structures. Recently, we have demonstrated that this small molecule greatly accelerates the assembly of G-quadruplex structures in a cell-free system. In this report, we present data demonstrating that PIPER prevents the unwinding of G-quadruplex structures by yeast Sgsl helicase. Sgsl belongs to the RecQ DNA helicase family whose members include other G-quadruplex DNA unwinding helicases, such as human Bloom's syndrome and human Werner's syndrome helicases. PIPER specifically prevents the unwinding of G-quadruplex DNA but not duplex DNA by Sgsl. Competition experiments indicate that this inhibitory activity is due to the interaction of PIPER with G-quadruplex structures rather than the helicase itself. These results combined with previous studies suggest a possible mechanism of action for these G-quadruplex-interactive agents inside cells: they might induce G-quadruplex formation in G-rich regions on genomic DNA, stabilize these structures, and prevent them from being cleared by enzymes such as helicases. The G-quadruplex structures may, in turn, disrupt some critical cellular events such as DNA replication, transcription regulation, and telomere maintenance.

Seaman, F. C., Chu, J., & Hurley, L. (1996). Cross-linkage by "intact" Bizelesin and bisalkylation by the "separated halves" of the Bizelesin dimer: Contrasting drug manipulation of DNA conformation (5′-TAATTA-3′) directs alkylation toward different adenine targets. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 118(23), 5383-5395.

Abstract:

Gel electrophoresis analysis of CPI-I bisalkylation of a 21-mer duplex containing 5′-TAA2TTA1-3′ (the palindromic preferred cross-linking sequence of the (+)-CC-1065 analog Bizelesin) shows same-strand (strand one) alkylation of first A1 and then A2 instead of the anticipated symmetrical A1 alkylation of strands one and two. Two-dimensional NMR analyses (NOESY and COSY) confirm the head-to-tail minor groove orientation of the same-strand-bound drugs. CPI-I contrasts sharply with Bizelesin (two CPI-I units linked tail-to-tail by a ureadiyl "linker"), which symmetrically cross-links this sequence at A1 (strands one and two), but only by first rearranging the duplex structure and consequently removing the duplex distortion stemming from monoadduct formation. CPI-I induces no such major DNA rearrangement prior to or during bisalkylation. Why does CPI-I react with the adenines of only a single strand? Two possible causes for the unexpected strand one A2 alkylation are, first, retardation of strand two A' site's reactivity by focusing of monoadduct conformational distortion on this site and, second, elevation of A2 reactivity above other competing adenine sites due to unusual monoadduct strand one A2T-step conformational properties. The relative importance of these two nonmutually exclusive factors was investigated using gel electrophoresis experiments: Time-course CPI-I bisalkylation studies were conducted on the AT-step sequence 5′-TAA2TTA1-3′ and an A-tract sequence, 5′-TAA2AAA1-3′, to see if the former sequence's AT-step flexibility, high base-pair opening rate, and unwinding capability (traits not shared by the latter sequence) controlled selection of the second target site. The observed parallel AT-step and A-tract sequence A1 and A2 bisalkylation patterns suggest that AT-step properties play at best a secondary role (compared to 5′-end TA-step behavior) in directing the second alkylation reaction to the AT-step site. rMD (solvated) simulations of the AT-step and A-tract monoadducts display distortion that is focused on this 5′-end TA-step site. While two-dimensional 1H NMR spectra of the final bisadduct reveal no significant TA-step conformational distortion, they demonstrate that conformational adjustment at the A2 ligand attachment site diminishes head-to-tail steric clash of the two drugs. These results suggest that the CPI-I monoadduct propagates bending distortion (to the 5′-side) through five base pairs toward the TA-step junction site. In the AT-step and A-tract sequences, neither adenine straddling this TA-step junction site is alkylated by CPI-I, suggesting that the base pairs forming the junction site are distorted away from a suitable orientation or are unable to assume a conformation suitable for alkylation. Consequently, the second alkylation occurs at a site (AT-step) that requires a modest displacement of the second ligand away from the already attached drug. The results and analysis of the data included in this paper provide important lessons for the design of inter- and intrastrand DNA-DNA cross-linkers.

Hurley, L., Brooks, T. A., & Hurley, L. -. (2009). The role of supercoiling in transcriptional control of MYC and its importance in molecular therapeutics. Nature reviews. Cancer, 9(12).

MYC is deregulated in most tumour types, but an effective means to selectively target its aberrant expression is not yet available. Supercoiling that is induced by transcription has been demonstrated to have dynamic effects on DNA in the MYC promoter element: it converts duplex DNA to non-duplex DNA structures, even at considerable distances from the transcriptional start site. These non-duplex DNA structures, which control both turning on and off of transcription and the rate of transcription firing, are amenable to small-molecule targeting. This dynamic system provides a unique opportunity for the treatment of tumours in which MYC is an important oncogene.

Hurley, L. H., & Daekyu, S. (1994). (+)-CC-1065 as a probe for intrinsic and protein-induced bending of DNA. Journal of Molecular Recognition, 7(2), 123-132.